Attack DAL with quarterbacks
Every week 3 game, ranked by how much of it is worth attacking.
DAL surrender 25.3 points a game to quarterbacks, 2nd-worst of 32 teams, and BAL bring a 28-point implied total to match. That's the column — start the BAL quarterback and skip the injury report. MIA are just as broken against running backs at 28.5 allowed, with KC sitting on the slate's highest implied total at 29. Own either backfield and this isn't a decision. Own neither and there are five more games waiting that don't involve you.
Attack DAL with quarterbacks
BAL at DAL
- Attack
- DAL vs QB
- Allowed
- 25.3 pts/gm
- Rank
- 2nd of 32
- Implied
- 28
- Total
- 52.5
- Line
- BAL are 3.5-point favourites
A 52.5 total will put half this game into lineups on its own. The reason to be in it is narrower than that. DAL allow the 2nd most to quarterbacks at 25.3 points a game, and BAL carry an implied 28 points, the 3rd-highest of the 32 sides playing. Start the BAL quarterback and stop reading the injury report about him. If you own none of them, it is still a good game to have on.
Attack MIA with running backs
KC at MIA
- Attack
- MIA vs RB
- Allowed
- 28.5 pts/gm
- Rank
- 2nd of 32
- Implied
- 29
- Total
- 46.5
- Line
- KC are 11.5-point favourites
A 11.5-point favourite is where managers start worrying about the fourth quarter, which is the wrong quarter to worry about. MIA allow the 2nd most to running backs at 28.5 points a game, and KC carry an implied 29 points, the highest of the 32 sides playing. Start the KC backs — both of them, if you were unlucky enough to draft both. If you own none of them, there is nothing in this paragraph for you.
Attack DET with tight ends
NYJ at DET
- Attack
- DET vs TE
- Allowed
- 23.5 pts/gm
- Rank
- 1st of 32
- Implied
- 20.5
- Total
- 47.5
- Line
- NYJ are 6.5-point underdogs
There is nothing subtle about this one, and there does not need to be. DET allow the most in the league to tight ends at 23.5 points a game, and NYJ carry an implied 20.5 points, 1.5 points under the slate median. The NYJ tight end is a start in a TE-premium lineup, which is the only kind you play. If you own nobody in this game, that is a problem for the waiver page, not this one.
Attack WAS with tight ends
SEA at WAS
- Attack
- WAS vs TE
- Allowed
- 19.9 pts/gm
- Rank
- 4th of 32
- Implied
- 23.8
- Total
- 40.5
- Line
- SEA are 7.0-point favourites
A 40.5 total is why most managers will scroll straight past SEA at WAS. WAS allow the 4th most to tight ends at 19.9 points a game, and SEA carry an implied 23.8 points, 1.8 points over the slate median. The SEA tight end is a start in a TE-premium lineup, which is the only kind you play. If you own none of them, there is nothing in this paragraph for you.
Attack ARI with tight ends
ARI at SF
- Attack
- ARI vs TE
- Allowed
- 16.4 pts/gm
- Rank
- 8th of 32
- Implied
- 28
- Total
- 47.5
- Line
- SF are 8.5-point favourites
A 47.5 total will put half this game into lineups on its own. The reason to be in it is narrower than that. ARI allow the 8th most to tight ends at 16.4 points a game, and SF carry an implied 28 points, the 3rd-highest of the 32 sides playing. The SF tight end is a start in a TE-premium lineup, which is the only kind you play. If you own none of them, it is still a good game to have on.
Attack TB with tight ends
MIN at TB
- Attack
- TB vs TE
- Allowed
- 20.8 pts/gm
- Rank
- 3rd of 32
- Implied
- 22
- Total
- 42.5
- Line
- MIN are 1.5-point favourites
The book has no read on this game at 1.5 points, so the matchup underneath it is the whole argument. TB allow the 3rd most to tight ends at 20.8 points a game, and MIN carry an implied 22 points, which is the slate median to within a point. The MIN tight end is a start in a TE-premium lineup, which is the only kind you play. If you own none of them, there is nothing in this paragraph for you.
Attack IND with tight ends
HOU at IND
- Attack
- IND vs TE
- Allowed
- 18.9 pts/gm
- Rank
- 5th of 32
- Implied
- 22.8
- Total
- 42.5
- Line
- HOU are 3.0-point favourites
IND are not bad at much. They are bad at tight ends. IND allow the 5th most to tight ends at 18.9 points a game, and HOU carry an implied 22.8 points, which is the slate median to within a point. The HOU tight end is a start in a TE-premium lineup, which is the only kind you play. If you own none of them, there is nothing in this paragraph for you.
Attack LAC with tight ends
LAC at BUF
- Attack
- LAC vs TE
- Allowed
- 14.8 pts/gm
- Rank
- 13th of 32
- Implied
- 28.8
- Total
- 50.5
- Line
- BUF are 7.0-point favourites
A 50.5 total will put half this game into lineups on its own. The reason to be in it is narrower than that. LAC allow the 13th most to tight ends at 14.8 points a game, and BUF carry an implied 28.8 points, the 2nd-highest of the 32 sides playing. The BUF tight end is a start in a TE-premium lineup, which is the only kind you play. If you own none of them, it is still a good game to have on.
Attack CIN with tight ends
CIN at PIT
- Attack
- CIN vs TE
- Allowed
- 21.9 pts/gm
- Rank
- 2nd of 32
- Implied
- 19.5
- Total
- 42.5
- Line
- PIT are 3.5-point underdogs
PIT are not going to score much, which is the part to ignore. They are going to score it in one place. CIN allow the 2nd most to tight ends at 21.9 points a game, and PIT carry an implied 19.5 points, 2.5 points under the slate median. The PIT tight end is a start in a TE-premium lineup, which is the only kind you play. If you own none of them, there is nothing in this paragraph for you.
Attack ATL with tight ends
ATL at GB
- Attack
- ATL vs TE
- Allowed
- 16.9 pts/gm
- Rank
- 6th of 32
- Implied
- 24.5
- Total
- 43.5
- Line
- GB are 5.5-point favourites
The spread is the least interesting thing about ATL at GB. ATL allow the 6th most to tight ends at 16.9 points a game, and GB carry an implied 24.5 points, the 6th-highest of the 32 sides playing. The GB tight end is a start in a TE-premium lineup, which is the only kind you play. If you own none of them, there is nothing in this paragraph for you.
Attack CAR with running backs
CAR at CLE
- Attack
- CAR vs RB
- Allowed
- 30.3 pts/gm
- Rank
- 1st of 32
- Implied
- 20
- Total
- 42.5
- Line
- CLE are 2.5-point underdogs
There is nothing subtle about this one, and there does not need to be. CAR allow the most in the league to running backs at 30.3 points a game, and CLE carry an implied 20 points, 2 points under the slate median. Start the CLE backs — both of them, if you were unlucky enough to draft both. If you own nobody in this game, that is a problem for the waiver page, not this one.
Attack CHI with quarterbacks
PHI at CHI
- Attack
- CHI vs QB
- Allowed
- 20.8 pts/gm
- Rank
- 8th of 32
- Implied
- 23
- Total
- 41.5
- Line
- PHI are 4.5-point favourites
The spread is the least interesting thing about PHI at CHI. CHI allow the 8th most to quarterbacks at 20.8 points a game, and PHI carry an implied 23 points, 1 points over the slate median. Start the PHI quarterback and stop reading the injury report about him. If you own none of them, there is nothing in this paragraph for you.
Attack DEN with running backs
LAR at DEN
- Attack
- DEN vs RB
- Allowed
- 23.8 pts/gm
- Rank
- 8th of 32
- Implied
- 24
- Total
- 45.5
- Line
- LAR are 2.5-point favourites
The book has no read on this game at 2.5 points, so the matchup underneath it is the whole argument. DEN allow the 8th most to running backs at 23.8 points a game, and LAR carry an implied 24 points, 2 points over the slate median. Start the LAR backs — both of them, if you were unlucky enough to draft both. If you own none of them, there is nothing in this paragraph for you.
Attack TEN with receivers
TEN at NYG
- Attack
- TEN vs WR
- Allowed
- 38.5 pts/gm
- Rank
- 3rd of 32
- Implied
- 21
- Total
- 39.5
- Line
- NYG are 2.5-point favourites
A 39.5 total is why most managers will scroll straight past TEN at NYG. TEN allow the 3rd most to receivers at 38.5 points a game, and NYG carry an implied 21 points, 1 points under the slate median. Start every NYG receiver you own. If you own none of them, there is nothing in this paragraph for you.
Attack NO with running backs
LV at NO
- Attack
- NO vs RB
- Allowed
- 25.2 pts/gm
- Rank
- 7th of 32
- Implied
- 20.8
- Total
- 44.5
- Line
- LV are 3.0-point underdogs
The spread is the least interesting thing about LV at NO. NO allow the 7th most to running backs at 25.2 points a game, and LV carry an implied 20.8 points, 1.2 points under the slate median. Start the LV backs — both of them, if you were unlucky enough to draft both. If you own none of them, there is nothing in this paragraph for you.
Attack JAX with tight ends
NE at JAX
- Attack
- JAX vs TE
- Allowed
- 13.8 pts/gm
- Rank
- 14th of 32
- Implied
- 21.2
- Total
- 45.5
- Line
- NE are 3.0-point underdogs
The spread is the least interesting thing about NE at JAX. JAX allow the 14th most to tight ends at 13.8 points a game, and NE carry an implied 21.2 points, which is the slate median to within a point. The NE tight end is a start in a TE-premium lineup, which is the only kind you play. If you own none of them, there is nothing in this paragraph for you.